Fast track bill implications

[Lilith7]

Anne Salmond has an open submission on the bill.


https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/04/20/anne-s...rack-bill/

The issues raised by the fast-track bill go far beyond party politics. They show an utter disregard for democracy ÔÇô ÔÇÿof the people, by the people, for the people.ÔÇÖ The bill also declares war on the natural world ÔÇô which is one we canÔÇÖt win.

No MP who believes in democracy can support this bill, and stay true to their values.  It lacks any democratic mandate.  It emerged from backroom deals among politicians, advanced by a party that won just 6 percent of the vote in the recent election. 

The majority party, with 38 percent of the vote, told voters that it was ÔÇ£passionate about safeguarding New ZealandÔÇÖs unique natural environment, abundant native biodiversity, pristine waters and spectacular landscapes for future generations.ÔÇØ Did it lie to the electorate? This bill is the antithesis of NationalÔÇÖs manifesto.

The fast-track bill also excludes citizens from having any say about what happens in their own communities, in favour of ministerial fiat. In its provisions, three ministers get to decide on projects that go on the ÔÇÿfast trackÔÇÖ for decision-making, and which projects are finally approved.┬á
In addition, these ministers get to choose the members of the advisory group and the convenor of the expert panels, who must consult them about appointees to the panels. Their powers are almost untrammelled, while the members of affected communities are excluded.

https://theconversation.com/5-reasons-wh...ems-227888