(14-07-2022, 09:57 AM)SueDonim Wrote:The other issue is that *those* nurses will be in a position of authority/power and might start peddling some of their nonsense to patients...(14-07-2022, 09:03 AM)king1 Wrote: Well assuming it is these folks
https://yabblezone.com/
then I would think it is safe to assume the sample population can't be random... 
for one it will exclude non techo folks, less likely to blindly follow conspiracies, more likely to follow the government health advice.
Thanks for the link. I agree.
I had a recent email customer survey from what was portrayed as a legitimate company that I deal with but decided that no way was I going to click on a link in an email that was called "Yabble" and hit delete instead. Even accepting the trend for "modern" (ie silly) names and the fact that it must be hard to come up with something original, I'm afraid "Yabble" just doesn't do it for me.
Regarding the issue of nurse vaccination, the baseline for nursing is evidence-based practice. Those nurses who refused to get vaccinated have shown their disregard for evidence, or their inability to understand it. Either way, the health sector is safer without them. Think of the ramifications if we had even more transmission from or within the health workforce. When nurses become patients and take up bed space needed by their patients. No, sorry, I disagree that we should allow unvaccinated healthcare workers. And I don't accept that a dodgy survey among laymen should influence the decision-making.
The world would be a perfect place, if it wasn't for the humans.
Electric Kiwi $50 credit | Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup
Electric Kiwi $50 credit | Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup