(07-05-2022, 12:38 PM)king1 Wrote: (07-05-2022, 09:10 AM)Wainuiguy Wrote: Well here I am and no I think the guy is an idiot.
And seems that at least threads I am involved with tend to get beyond a dozen posts.   Unlike most on here.
And seems the last thread I was involved with the only person who killed it was King1 - when he killed the thread for some reason.
lol yes, 'for some reason'...  anyway if you want you can have another go, i'll open that thread again - let's see how long it takes you...
Oh yeah "being abusive".  So if I call someone an egg that is abuse but calling someone a stupid fucking pantywaste - that's all good?
(07-05-2022, 02:37 PM)Lilith7 Wrote: (07-05-2022, 12:57 PM)king1 Wrote: Where did this 'sexual assault apologist' bit come from?
He's referring to a discussion over the way several months ago. Can't remember the exact words I used after so long but I was pointing out that a particular sexual assault they were all having fun discussing was, while still abhorrent, at least at the less serious end of the scale.
This poster decided that he'd do his usual trick of twisting my words to claim they really meant that I was an apologist for sexual assault.
Taking someone else's post & twisting their meaning is quite common over there. 
You're just embarrassed that you used a total scumbag to try and argue your point.   Then attempted to try and lessen what he did.
