Luxon

[Magoo]

while I consider your previous post Magoo... 

What exactly do you think Mr Luxon meant when he was referring to bottom feeders?  and why is it not OK for folks to speculate on what he meant? Mr Luxon opened the door on this one...

what i think is not relevant.
my point is not what mr luxon said or meant
its what mr campbell said and meant, dressed up as mr luxons statement.
i think they call it 'gaslighting'. i still call it lying, old fashioned like that.
you keep going back to what he meant or what he implied as some sort of defence, its not relevant to the argument, he didnt say it, mr campbell took it upon himself to say it for him.

when you censor my posts like that kingi i cant remember what i said so dont know for next time.
something about horseface, crack and mr gayfords proclivities being allowed now that weve opened the slur gate on public figures? blunt but accurate, sorry, i shouldnt have pointed it out that was mean.

should not the op of this thread had the rider attached about misinformation contained herein?

---

king

If I was to have a guess at what he intended, it was a dig at Labour and their support base that went spectacularly wrong

thats exactly what happened.

its hard to say labours support base are a hopeless bunch losers waiting for a handout in a nice way.
he should have said
 'we will not pander to the loudest and lowest, we have labour for that, we will be focussing on the working poor, those working a 40 hour week and its not enough to survive on, let alone save on. these are the people hurting, the workers, the tax payers.'