May as well forget scanning in

[king1]

the 200 is year and a half old information, not exactly guaranteed to be factual now, especially since we know from the news they have added many hundreds of staff to the contact tracing crew. 

Your guessing at the current contract tracing capacity, especially assuming that contact tracing fails at 400, or any number for that matter - without any accurate data to support it...  This would probably be an example of cherry picking the evidence to suit your argument...

And yet we have one of NZ main cities and Capital not having points of interest updated for almost a week and the Hutt Valley for longer.

Again if the numbers are wrong why haven't they said so?  The press have used that 200 number recently yet  MOH, Hipkins or Bloomfield haven't come out and stated that was wrong.

A bit like saying they can do up to 58000 tests a day - great sound bite except they can't PROCESS that many, only about half and not in the long term.

maybe you should ask them rather than making wild guesses and speculation, framed as facts?