The infamous BFD under surveillance

[Lilith7]

I think any one or group who openly speaks in favour of civil unrest should be on a watch list. Information is power, and if we could step in ahead of dangerous acts that threaten the security of people, and property why wouldn't we do so?

Or do we ignore criticism? I very much doubt those making critical statements want to be ignored. They want to be seen and heard. They want to inspire change. It is the illegal actions designed to bring about that change that have to be subject to observation in the planning,  and on occasion responded to, surely...

For instance - just how long are we going to stand back and allow the likes of the fake bishop to foment civil disobedience and encourage dangerous behaviour?

Agreed - criticism is one thing, but inciting or virtually inciting civil unrest is another thing altogether. And in view of recent events in America after similar comments, any govt of any country experiencing similar comments would be foolish in the extreme to ignore them.

The recent comments from the McBishop are an excellent example of that.