(20-12-2021, 01:37 PM)egem Wrote:I'm glad you asked.  The warning was for "Altering quoted text without acknowledgement" which substantially misrepresented what the original poster said (myself in this case) in the original post.  (20-12-2021, 12:12 PM)king1 Wrote: I think we all know what Me+Me meant...  I have posted a copy of the document in question so we can all know exactly what it says.  Then we can move on to meaningful discussion about the document, whether it helps or hinders their cause etc, rather than getting caught up in technicalities of prose
By "technicalities of prose" do you mean inaccurate posts?
Actually I am glad you are here. Can you please tell me why I received a warning from you this morning for "Altering quoted text without acknowledgement (+2 points)".
Thanks.
Altering someone's quoted words is acceptable if you acknowledge it, an example of which is post #34 from the same thread.
Altering what someone else has said by altering the quoted text that you are replying to, as you have done, without their knowledge or approval, is not acceptable, for obvious reasons.
The world would be a perfect place, if it wasn't for the humans.
Electric Kiwi $50 credit | Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup
Electric Kiwi $50 credit | Sharesies | Buy Crypto | Surfshark VPN | Cloud Backup