Too Many Message Boards
ACT rules out working with NZ First - Printable Version

+- Too Many Message Boards (http://tmmb.mywire.org)
+-- Forum: General Topics (http://tmmb.mywire.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Opinion and Politics (http://tmmb.mywire.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=75)
+--- Thread: ACT rules out working with NZ First (/showthread.php?tid=2356)

Pages: 1 2

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - Oh_hunnihunni - 05-08-2023

Pity about him in charge though. Because the reality is the party exists only as a vehicle for that ego. Bit like ACT in that regard.

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - Lilith7 - 05-08-2023

(05-08-2023, 09:36 AM)C_T_Russell Wrote:
(03-08-2023, 04:54 PM)harm_less Wrote: Surely a certain upstanding and well experienced ex-airline CEO would keep them in line. The term clusterf*ck does seem apt, and a good portion of Godzone will be under Chinese ownership seems possible, so our infrastructure issues gain a whole new significance.

Never mind bilingual road signage. Maybe get used to some Mandarin characters joining the roading landscape?
Even more reason we need NZF.

What, to create havoc & mayhem? Rolleyes Big Grin

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - C_T_Russell - 08-08-2023

(03-08-2023, 04:54 PM)harm_less Wrote:
(03-08-2023, 03:24 PM)Lilith7 Wrote: What could possibly go wrong...? Rolleyes Big Grin

It would be entertaining though, if extremely annoying.
Surely a certain upstanding and well experienced ex-airline CEO would keep them in line. The term clusterf*ck does seem apt, and a good portion of Godzone will be under Chinese ownership seems possible, so our infrastructure issues gain a whole new significance.

Never mind bilingual road signage. Maybe get used to some Mandarin characters joining the roading landscape?

Vouting NZF will ensure no Chinese ownership of our assets.

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - R2x1 - 08-08-2023

Quote:"ACT rules out working with NZ First"

A moderately popular theory is that ACT wouldn't work in an Iron Lung.

Wink

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - Lilith7 - 09-08-2023

(08-08-2023, 10:36 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote:
(03-08-2023, 04:54 PM)harm_less Wrote: Surely a certain upstanding and well experienced ex-airline CEO would keep them in line. The term clusterf*ck does seem apt, and a good portion of Godzone will be under Chinese ownership seems possible, so our infrastructure issues gain a whole new significance.

Never mind bilingual road signage. Maybe get used to some Mandarin characters joining the roading landscape?

Vouting NZF will ensure no Chinese ownership of our assets.



As could voting National.


https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/08/02/national-would-absolutely-take-money-from-china-to-pay-for-roads/



And possibly, voting ACT.

https://croakingcassandra.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/has-the-act-party-betrayed-its-principles-on-china-by-weijian-chen-published-in-beijing-spring.pdf


t was a snapshot of the cityÔÇÖs past.
"David, and the party he leads, have chosen the ÔÇÿChinese HeraldÔÇÖ as a target for political advertising this election; in my view, that paper is a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The ÔÇÿChinese HeraldÔÇÖ carries articles from Chinese state-run publications like Xinhua and relays deceptive Communist propaganda which misrepresents the cause that these brave people stand for.┬á

Why would the ACT Party choose to place its advertising in a newspaper with links to a regime whose ideology and outlook is hostile to democracy and freedom?
┬áMany Chinese voters will be disappointed- for like me, they have followed David SeymourÔÇÖs impressive performances in the mainstream media on issues that fundamentally matter to us. But now they know that the ACT Party is effectively endorsing the Chinese Communist Herald."

RE: ACT rules out working with NZ First - C_T_Russell - 09-08-2023

(09-08-2023, 11:47 AM)Lilith7 Wrote:
(08-08-2023, 10:36 PM)C_T_Russell Wrote: Vouting NZF will ensure no Chinese ownership of our assets.



As could voting National.


https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/08/02/national-would-absolutely-take-money-from-china-to-pay-for-roads/



And possibly, voting ACT.

https://croakingcassandra.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/has-the-act-party-betrayed-its-principles-on-china-by-weijian-chen-published-in-beijing-spring.pdf


t was a snapshot of the cityÔÇÖs past.
"David, and the party he leads, have chosen the ÔÇÿChinese HeraldÔÇÖ as a target for political advertising this election; in my view, that paper is a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The ÔÇÿChinese HeraldÔÇÖ carries articles from Chinese state-run publications like Xinhua and relays deceptive Communist propaganda which misrepresents the cause that these brave people stand for.┬á

Why would the ACT Party choose to place its advertising in a newspaper with links to a regime whose ideology and outlook is hostile to democracy and freedom?
┬áMany Chinese voters will be disappointed- for like me, they have followed David SeymourÔÇÖs impressive performances in the mainstream media on issues that fundamentally matter to us. But now they know that the ACT Party is effectively endorsing the Chinese Communist Herald."

Well that makes me feel a bit better about ACT, but i like NZF immigration policy better.